Relevant experience of any sort is always helpful in a new career. Things you could put on your resume include seasonal jobs and even volunteering. Try mentioning any clubs you participated in during high school, too.
If we encounter the zero lower bound the next time around, you know, we’ve gotten quite a bit of practice and familiarity with forward guidance, with quantitative easing. So I think that we’re actually in a better place today than we were 10 years ago, when we really didn’t have a good sense of, you know, what tools did we have, how would they work? So I feel more comfortable in that sense. The other thing I would just say — add is, when you’re thinking about what could we do to reduce the risk of the Fed running out of ammunition in the next downturn, it’s not clear to me that it all has to rely on monetary policy. Another thing one might want to look at is, is there a greater role for fiscal policy in the next downturn? And one thing that I think would be worthy of study is whether — maybe we should bolster the automatic fiscal stabilizers. So just — this is an example. you could try this outThis is not a proposal. http://richadrianfisher.pdxrwa.org/2016/08/30/professional-advice-on-effective-solutions-in-interviewBut as an example, let’s imagine that we had a system where the unemployment rate rose by more than X, payroll taxes got automatically cut. That would provide support to the economy.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.nasdaq.com/article/transcript-a-wall-street-journal-interview-with-new-york-feds-william-dudley-20161014-00403
The document for city prosecutors details how to handle potential plea bargains for moving violations in Denver. It says the standard plea bargain is to reduce the points on a violation by half except for certain citations like texting while driving, permit and interlock violations. But the passage that has raised the ire of defense attorneys relates to careless driving charges. If there is a factual basis for careless, bargain it the same as any other charge, says the guideline. If you do not feel the facts support careless, ignore it when making an offer, but do not dismiss it until D(defendant) pleads or the trial date. David Miller, a former prosecutor in Denver and now a defense attorney, reviewed the document and told CBS4, It is unethical to proceed with a charge when you know that there are no facts to support it. It basically says if you dont plead guilty I wont dismiss something I know I cant prove just to punish you. This is a clear abuse of discretion and a violation of the prosecutors code of ethics. Miller went on to say, Its more like dealing from the bottom of the deck. Its cheating and not an honest, level playing field. That ethical code for Colorado prosecutors says the prosecutor in a criminal case shall refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause. Harvey Steinberg, a Denver defense attorney, said the internal document obtained by CBS4 clearly suggests that prosecutors act improperly. It is fundamentally unfair for the government to keep a charge hanging over your head when they know they cant prove it. If they know they cant prove it beyond a reasonable doubt they are both constitutionally and ethically obligated to dismiss it.When the city knows they cant prove the charge they have a duty to tell the defendant that. It forces pleas. Thats what its all about, said Steinberg.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://denver.cbslocal.com/2016/10/16/denver-city-attorney-guideline-hit-as-abusive-unethical/